‘I am not alone in the conviction that all religions are created by human beings.’ Photo: by Marcos Paulo Prado on Unsplash

‘The most profound glimpses of religious truth stem from the human spirit.’

Beyond belief: G Gordon Steel’s Thought for the week

‘The most profound glimpses of religious truth stem from the human spirit.’

by G Gordon Steel 23rd February 2024

I always have a wry smile when I hear the lovely hymn that begins ‘This is the truth sent from above / the truth of God, the God of love.’ You may remember that it goes on to say, ‘The first thing that I will relate / that God at first did man create’. I am in no doubt that this should really be – if you excuse the gendered language – ‘Man did God create’. These days I am not alone in the conviction that all religions are created by human beings, and it gives me great comfort to know that there are many Quakers, particularly in Britain, who feel this way.

Throughout human history, people in all parts of the world have tended to feel that ‘There must be something beyond this dreadful life.’ Early humans saw it in nature; in the far east and Mesopotamia the feeling gave rise to a variety of early religions. A key factor has been the way people tend to form groups around charismatic individuals, probably because this gives us a sense of support and identity. Thus came the great figures of world religions – we, of course, have George Fox and Margaret Fell.

Christianity is remarkable in its emphasis on the written word. Its intellectual processes have generated various theologies. Historically, Jesus of Nazareth is our charismatic individual, but there have always been debates about who he was. Karen Armstrong, the nun turned liberal author, says ‘It was St. Paul, not Jesus, who was the founder of Christianity and even he would have been dismayed by some of the theological conclusions that were later drawn from his letters.’

Another feature of historical Christianity has been its holding of political power. Quakers have viewed with dismay the vast edifices of the mainstream churches. Certain proclamations by the pope are thought to be inerrant, for example, and the church in England has burned many ‘heretics’.

So the contrast with Quakerism is marked. If power is exercised in the Society of Friends it is probably local. Many years ago I tended to speak too often in Meeting about the philosopher of religion Don Cupitt, who argues that everything is ‘non-real’, including God. I was counselled to hold off. In a Canadian Meeting, after speaking in a liberal way, I was followed by an elder who reminded Friends of the more orthodox view.

For me, the most profound glimpses of religious truth stem from the depths of the human spirit. They are gained through inwardness. They encompass the joy of being alive, our own experience of suffering, our compassion for others, and our oneness with friends and the many memorable people whose lives have influenced us – in history and literature, and those who have come our way. Another Quaker, William Penn, put it well: ‘The humble, meek, merciful, just, pious, and devout souls are everywhere of one religion.’


Comments


The spirit is ‘God’ given. The inwardness is the Light, to which we respond. It is available to all.
Listening to it teaches us how to respond with love, compassion and action in our lives.
The ability to recognise the spirit is through grace, for which we are deeply grateful.

By rosete on 2024 02 22


I feel that William Penn has been quoted selectively in Gordon Steel’s “Thought for the week”. The whole passage, which can be found in Quaker faith and practice (19.28, reads as follows;

The humble, meek, merciful, just, pious, and devout souls are everywhere of one religion; and when death has taken off the mask they will know one another, though the divers liveries they wear here makes them strangers. This world is a form; our bodies are forms; and no visible acts of devotion can be without forms. But yet the less form in religion the better, since God is a Spirit; for the more mental our worship, the more adequate to the nature of God; the more silent, the more suitable to the language of a Spirit.

I find no evidence for the view that early Friends would have supported the view that “Man did create God” if their literature is read in a non selective way.

In friendship

Richard Pashley. Bull St Meeting.

By Richard Pashley on 2024 02 23


Please login to add a comment

Past thoughts for the week