Why we need an animal revolution Photo: Photo: Jean-Pierre / flickr CC.
Why we need an animal revolution
It’s high time we came into right relationship, says Heidi Stephenson
‘There are two paths, one of life and one of death, and the difference is great between the two.’ So opens the ancient Didache (one of the oldest patristic writings of the early church). Tragically, where the rest of the animal kingdom is concerned, we’ve taken the path of death.
Basic rights
Every year billions of animals are brought into the world just to die and suffer at our hands. We brand them, number them, take away their young, forcibly inseminate them, painfully experiment on them, take the fur from their backs and deny them the most basic rights: not just to life, but to freedom from bodily harm, sunshine, fresh air, natural habitat, company of their own kind, the right to choose their mates, to respect and dignity – and very often to sleep, rest, food, shelter, even water too.
Sickeningly, the only daylight most ‘factory farmed’ animals ever get to see is on their terrifying last journey to the slaughter house. We even make a sadistic ‘sport’ of hunting and baiting them. It’s a deeply disturbing picture. If this is Imago Dei, one dreads to think what the Other Place must look like. For animals we have created a veritable hell on earth.
Facing facts
The facts are grim, but they must be faced. Every year sixty billion animals (excluding fish) lose their lives to the meat industry alone. Most are still babies when they die. Some, like ‘suckling’ pigs and ‘veal’ calves, are not even weaned (much to the intense grief of their mothers.) Each of these is an individual: a sentient, suffering being – much as the industry might try to depersonalise them as so many ‘stock,’ ‘units’ or numbers.
The average meat eater consumes over 11,000 animals across a lifetime: 1,158 chickens, 6,182 fish, thirty-nine turkeys, twenty-three sheep, eighteen pigs, twenty-eight ducks, four cows, and at least one goose and a rabbit. Every death is an extinction. Slaughter is rarely humane. There’s no special treatment for ‘organic.’ Nor does the Freedom Food label, unfortunately, offer any protection to the lamb who’s about to be pushed onto the killing floor. That’s a lot of lives, a lot of suffering.
In the torturous, lonely world of the laboratory, another 100 million victims die annually in experiments. Shockingly, eighty-six per cent of the time the experiments have absolutely nothing to do with new medicines. And this in a time when we have so many humane alternatives: MRI, CAT and PET scanning, use of human cells, tissues and organ culture, molecular and test tube methods, clinical trials on voluntary human patients (far more accurate, of course), use of computer models and, importantly, the development of disease prevention.
Denial
We have enslaved the rest of the animal kingdom on a scale and gravity never seen before in the history of rapacious Homo sapiens. How can we continue to justify this? Unfortunately, our long-entrenched speciesism persuades us that there is a crucial difference between other animals and us. We tell ourselves that they don’t feel like we do, so their suffering is somehow less. We tell ourselves that they don’t matter – not where there is a human interest involved anyway. But this is ‘fallen’ humanity, hiding behind a veil of maya – in wilful, supreme denial.
Anyone who has ever had the pleasure of sharing their life with an animal companion and of engaging in a relationship based on trust, rather than exploitation, absolutely knows that they feel a complex range of emotions easily recognisable to us; that they dream (and therefore process their experiences); that they anticipate and remember. What more proof do we need of consciousness? This begs serious moral and ethical questions. Animal rights – the rights of nonhuman animals (to break up a much maligned term) is one of the most pressing social justice issues of our time. It’s long overdue that we come into right relationship.
Courage
It’s not easy, but we need to have the courage to bear witness. We mustn’t close our eyes to their pain. The animals are completely disenfranchised. They have no voice. Only we can change things. We can no longer ignore when there is so much at stake. Our avoidance condemns billions. How can we continue to hide behind society’s myths (our fluffy Easter chicks – and all those male hatchlings who die within seventy-two hours of being born, for example) when it comes at this terrible price?
Television advertisers and the vested interests might like to convince us that cows enjoy making butter, that chickens line-up to become nuggets, and French laboratory rabbits concur that ‘we’re worth it,’ but we know in our deepest selves these things aren’t true.
There is already so much pain in our own lives, we say. We can’t cope with any more. Yes, but we must remember, their pain is a thousand-fold greater than ours. We live lives of such privilege in comparison. Can’t we offer just a little generosity?
Unfortunately, most people aren’t connecting with the day-to-day reality of the animals’ experience at all. We know about it in vague, abstract terms – that it happens, that we don’t like it – but we’re not engaging with it viscerally, empathically. It’s this, combined with the fact that animal exploiters like to keep their activities behind closed doors, away from public scrutiny (for obvious reasons) that allows all this atrocity to continue. Theory keeps us at a safe distance, in our heads – we need to connect with our hearts.
Empathy is a powerful tool. The Golden Rule – do as you would be done by – was based on nothing less. For too long we have been derided for making the natural leap with nonhuman beings. ‘Anthropomorphism’ is an old and bitter accusation. But it’s not about projecting, rather about identifying and recognising – observational, Cartesian tools after all. It’s about focusing on our similarities (which are many) and not on our differences (which, in basic terms, are few). To link to the suffering of another, to have the sensitivity and compassion to feel their pain and care, is the ultimate act of love. And intelligence; our survival as a species has depended on it.
Taking action
Every one of us can make a difference. We are not powerless. Above all, we can stop eating flesh. Meat is an addiction. We don’t need it. In fact, our omnivorous bodies are infinitely healthier without it. (Especially in these growth hormone, antibiotic-pumped times.) It’s the single most powerful thing we can do. We can take a step further and become vegan, avoiding all animal products. We were weaned long ago after all. Our protein needs are easily taken care of. A vegan diet really isn’t one of gourmet deprivation at all.
Buying only cruelty-free cosmetics, personal and household products, is another big step in the right direction. It’s no longer expensive to care. In the UK, many of the major supermarkets own-brand products are now animal-friendly and carry the BUAV’s (British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection) leaping bunny logo: the Co-operative, M&S, Sainsburys and Superdrug, for example. When even toilet bleach and furniture polish are tested on animals, it’s the least we can do.
Let’s dream a world – and actively create one – in which cruelty and abuse are a thing of the past. There is no higher purpose than to protect the weak and vulnerable, to free the enslaved and the suffering, to transform the darkness. There is no greater love. In this Olympic year, let’s become torchbearers of a new ethic; one based on equality of beingness, and on inherent worth. Let’s manifest the Peaceable Kingdom, an earthly Nirvana – right here, right now. As Victor Hugo said, ‘There’s nothing more powerful than an idea whose time has come.’
Heidi is a writer and animal campaigner. Her forthcoming book is The Book of Life: The Lost Teachings of Jesus on the Animal Kingdom.
For more information see: www.gocrueltyfree.org
Originally published in Resurgence magazine.
Comments
I totally agree. I have been vegetarian for a long time and have tried to buy cruelty free. This has been made much easier since I discovered Animalaid (animalaid.org.uk). Through another website uncaged.org I was able to sign the Declaration or Animal Rights and would urge all Quakers to sign up.
By Jackie on 15th November 2012 - 18:09
Eloquently expressed, extremely distressing to read - although most of the facts are familiar to me. Thanks also for the comment re animalaid. I’ll sign up.
By mojacqui on 16th November 2012 - 9:31
I’m sure that everyone reading this will share the common desire to do everything they can to support the highest standards of animal husbandry. As a farmer with over 40 years’ experience, I share not only the same objectives but also recognise the invaluable role that livestock play within mixed farming systems both here and elsewhere in the world. The Foot and Mouth outbreak of 2001/2002 and resulting loss of livestock on many hill farms demonstrated the extent to which livestock are inextricably linked to the management of the landscape, local communities and supporting farming, especially in marginal areas. It also demonstrated just some of the impacts that removing livestock from the farming landscape can have and therefore, as with any revolution, we need to ensure that the impacts of the solutions being proposed are carefully thought through. It is important that everyone plays an active role in shaping the way food is produced, processed and made available to people. Farming is shaped by a complex balance of influences and rarely as black-and-white as might be suggested here, and certainly the extremes being described are thankfully very rare. We therefore need to ensure that the evidence that is being presented for us to consider is both representative and balanced, otherwise we risk losing the benefits of livestock within farming systems as we strive to eliminate those elements that Heidi has described in her article.
By John T on 19th November 2012 - 16:34
Please login to add a comment
