After many conversations with Friends, I have concluded that, if non-resistance means doing nothing about evil, we do not accept this maxim – and nor did Jesus Photo: Peace and resistance icons by Jon Tyson on Unsplash

‘We can think that there may be exceptions to a principle without feeling guilty that we have therefore failed it.’

Returning evil: John Lampen’s Thought for the week

‘We can think that there may be exceptions to a principle without feeling guilty that we have therefore failed it.’

by John Lampen 7th July 2023

In a recent letter (16 June), Gerard Bane asked whether ‘Resist not evil, but return evil with good’ is still a defining feature of Quakerism. After many conversations with Friends, I have concluded that, if non-resistance means doing nothing about evil, we do not accept this maxim – and nor did Jesus, Paul of Tarsus or George Fox. But if ‘resistance’ implies ‘using any means available’, many Friends would say no to that too.

You’ve read three free articles this month. To read more, you will need to:

  • Already subscribed? Click here to log in!
  • wait a month to see three more free of charge, or
  • register for a free account and receive two additional free articles per month, or
  • subscribe for unlimited access to our back catalogue, just £85 for the year!
Image of The Friend Publications

Subscribe to the Friend today

Become a subscriber to enjoy unlimited access to our articles, dating back to 2009! Online subscribers get the Friend to their inbox each week, can comment on articles, and dive into our 1914-18 digital archive too!

Whether you are new to Quakerism or have been going to Meeting for years, you’ll find something here to inspire, inform and challenge you.

News | Views | Reviews

Written by and for Friends on the bench

Subscribe